Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 451
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 26(8): 786-791, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934823

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition or its risk affects up to 70% of cancer patients. Compared to adequately nourished oncology patients, those with malnutrition experience more complications and have poorer prognoses, thus higher needs for healthcare. We compared utilization of emergency department (ED) services and costs for Medicare-covered cancer patients with or without a malnutrition diagnosis. METHODS: We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Standard Analytic File to identify fee-for-service beneficiaries who had a cancer diagnosis, and had one or more outpatient claims in 2018. We totaled individual claims and costs for ED visits per beneficiary, then calculated mean per-person claims and costs for malnourished vs non-malnourished patients. RESULTS: Using data from over 2.8 million claims of patients with cancer diagnoses, the prevalence of diagnosed malnutrition was 2.5%. The most common cancer types were genitourinary, hematologic/blood, and breast. Cancer patients with a malnutrition diagnosis, compared to those without, had a significantly higher annual total number of outpatient claims (21.4 vs. 11.5, P<.0001), including a 2.5-fold higher rate of ED visits (1.43 vs. 0.56, p<.0001). As result, such patients incurred more than 2-fold higher mean ED claim costs than did their adequately nourished counterparts ($10,724 vs. $4,935, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that malnutrition in cancer patients imposes a high outpatient burden on resource utilization and costs of care in terms of ED use. We propose that nutritional interventions can be used to improve health outcomes for people with cancer and to improve economic outcomes for patients and providers.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Desnutrição , Neoplasias , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Medicare/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Estados Unidos
2.
Am Surg ; 88(8): 1783-1791, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older adults (OAs; ≥ 65 years) comprise a growing population in the United States and are anticipated to require an increasing number of emergency general surgery procedures (EGSPs). The aims of this study were to identify the frequency of EGSPs and compare cost of care in OAs managed at teaching hospitals (THs) vs nonteaching hospitals (NTHs). METHODS: A retrospective review of data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database from 2009 to 2018 for OAs undergoing EGSPs was undertaken. Data collected included demographics, all patient-refined (APR)-severity of illness (SOI), APR-risk of mortality (ROM), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), EGSPs (partial colectomy (PC), small bowel resection, cholecystectomy, operative management of peptic ulcers, lysis of adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy, categorized hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 55,401 OAs undergoing EGSPs in this study, 28,575 (51.6%) were treated at THs and 26,826 (48.4%) at NTHs. OAs at THs presented with greater APR-ROM (major 25.6% vs 24.9%, extreme 22.6% vs 22.0%, P=.01), and CCI (3.1±3 vs 2.7±2.8, P<.001) compared to NTHs. Lysis of adhesions, cholecystectomy, and PC comprised the overall most common EGSPs. Older adults at THs incurred comparatively higher median hospital charges for every EGSP due to increased room charges and LOS. Mortality was higher at THs (6.13% vs 5.33%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: While acuity of illness appears similar, cost of undergoing EGSPs for OAs is higher in THs vs NTHs due to increased LOS. Future work is warranted to determine and mitigate factors that increase LOS at THs.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais de Ensino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Maryland , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia
3.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(7): 576-583, 2022 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319947

RESUMO

GOALS: The aim was to investigate the impact of night-time emergency department (ED) presentation on outcomes of patients admitted for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH). BACKGROUND: The relationship between time of ED presentation and outcomes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage is unclear. STUDY: Using the 2016 and 2017 Florida State Inpatient Databases which provide times of ED arrival, we identified and categorized adults hospitalized for UGIH to daytime (07:00 to 18:59 h) and night-time (19:00 to 06:59 h) based on the time of ED presentation. We matched both groups with propensity scores, and assessed their clinical outcomes including all-cause in-hospital mortality, in-hospital endoscopy utilization, length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization costs, and 30-day all-cause readmission rates. RESULTS: Of the identified 38,114 patients with UGIH, 89.4% (n=34,068) had acute nonvariceal hemorrhage (ANVH), while 10.6% (n=4046) had acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH). Compared with daytime patients, ANVH patients admitted at night-time had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.60), lower odds of in-patient endoscopy (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.90), higher total hospital costs ($9911 vs. $9545, P <0.016), but similar LOS and readmission rates. Night-time AVH patients had a shorter LOS (5.4 vs. 5.8 d, P =0.045) but similar mortality rates, endoscopic utilization, total hospitalization costs, and readmission rates as daytime patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients arriving in the ED at night-time with ANVH had worse outcomes (mortality, hospitalization costs, and endoscopy utilization) compared with daytime patients. However, those with AVH had comparable outcomes irrespective of ED arrival time.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 773-777, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698640

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: While the role of palliative care in the emergency department is recognized, barriers against the effective integration of palliative interventions and emergency care remain. We examined the association between goals-of-care and palliative care consultations and healthcare utilization outcomes in older adult patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 197 patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis or septic shock. Healthcare utilization outcomes were compared between patients divided into 3 groups: no palliative care consultation, palliative care consultation within 4 days of admission (i.e., early consultation), and palliative care consultation after 4 days of admission (i.e., late consultation). RESULTS: 51% of patients did not receive any palliative consultation, 39% of patients underwent an early palliative care consultation (within 4 days), and 10% of patients underwent a late palliative care consultation (after 4 days). Patients who received late palliative care consultation had a significantly increased number of procedures, total length of stay, ICU length of stay, and cost (p < .01, p < .001, p < .05, p < .001; respectively). Regarding early palliative care consultation, there were no statistically significant associations between this intervention and our outcomes of interest; however, we noted a trend towards decreased total length of stay and decreased healthcare cost. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis, early palliative consultations were associated with reduced healthcare utilization as compared to late palliative consultations.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Sepse/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(34): e27066, 2021 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449502

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: There has been a historic separation between systems that address behavioral health problems and the medical care system that addresses other health issues. Integration of the 2 has the potential to improve care.The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Integrated Behavioral Health program on health care utilization and costs.Claims data between 2015 and 2018 from Rhode Island's All Payers Claims Database representing 42,936 continuously enrolled unique patients.Retrospective study based on propensity score-matched difference-in-differences framework.Utilization (emergency department visits, office visits, and hospitalizations) and costs (total, inpatient, outpatient, professional, and pharmacy).Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with reduction in healthcare utilization. Emergency department visits reduced by 6.4 per 1000 people per month and office visits reduced by 29.8 per 1000 people per month, corresponding to a reduction of 7% and 6%, respectively. No statistically significant association was observed between the intervention and hospitalizations. The evidence was mixed for cost outcomes, with negative association recorded between the intervention and the likelihood of incurring non-zero cost but no significant association was observed between the intervention and the level of costs. This relationship held true for most of the cost measures considered.Integrated Behavioral Health intervention in Rhode Island was associated with significant reductions in emergency department visits and office visits, with no effects on hospitalizations. In terms of the cost outcomes, we found evidence that the intervention negatively affected the likelihood of incurring any non-zero costs but did not affect the level of costs.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Integração de Sistemas , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia
6.
Urology ; 157: 107-113, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391774

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize full cycle of care costs for managing an acute ureteral stone using time-driven activity-based costing. METHODS: We defined all phases of care for patients presenting with an acute ureteral stone and built an overarching process map. Maps for sub-processes were constructed through interviews with providers and direct observation of clinical spaces. This facilitated calculation of cost per minute for all aspects of care delivery, which were multiplied by associated process times. These were added to consumable costs to determine cost for each specific step and later aggregated to determine total cost for each sub-process. We compared costs of eight common clinical pathways for acute stone management, defining total cycle of care cost as the sum of all sub-processes that comprised each pathway. RESULTS: Cost per sub-process included $920 for emergency department (ED) care, $1665 for operative stent placement, $2368 for percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement, $106 for urology clinic consultation, $238 for preoperative center visit, $4057 for ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (URS), $2923 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, $169 for clinic stent removal, $197 for abdominal x-ray, and $166 for ultrasound. The lowest cost pathway ($1388) was for medical expulsive therapy, whereas the most expensive pathway ($8002) entailed a repeat ED visit prompting temporizing stent placement and interval URS. CONCLUSION: We found a high degree of cost variation between care pathways common to management of acute ureteral stone episodes. Reliable cost accounting data and an understanding of variability in clinical pathway costs can inform value-based care redesign as payors move away from pure fee-for-service reimbursement.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Cálculos Ureterais/economia , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Doença Aguda , Custos e Análise de Custo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Humanos , Litotripsia a Laser/economia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/economia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Implantação de Prótese/economia , Radiografia Abdominal/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Stents/economia , Ultrassonografia/economia , Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ureteroscopia/economia
7.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0252919, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34143802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the course of the COVID19 pandemic, global healthcare delivery has declined. Surgery is one of the most resource-intensive area of medicine; loss of surgical care has had untold health and economic consequences. Herein, we evaluate resource utilization, outcomes, and healthcare costs associated with unplanned surgery admissions during the height of the pandemic in 2020 versus the same period in 2019. METHODS: Retrospective analysis on patients ≥18 years admitted from the emergency department to General & Digestive and Gastrointestinal Surgery Services between February and May 2019 and 2020 at our center; clinical outcomes and unadjusted and adjusted per-person healthcare costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Consults and admissions to surgery declined between February and May 2020 by 37% and 19%, respectively, relative to the same period in 2019, with even greater relative decline during late March and early April. Time between onset of symptoms to diagnosis increased from 2±3 days 2019 to 5±22 days 2020 (P = 0.01). Overall hospital stay was two days less in 2020 (P = 0.19). Complications (Comprehensive Complication Index 10.3±23.7 2019 vs. 13.9±25.5 2020, P = 0.10) and mortality rates (3% vs. 4%, respectively, P = 0.58) did not vary. Mean unadjusted per-person costs for patients in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts were 5,886.72€±12,576.33€ and 5,287.62±7,220.16€, respectively (P = 0.43). Following multivariate analysis, costs remained similar (4,656.89€±390.53€ 2019 vs. 4,938.54±406.55€ 2020, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare delivery and spending for unplanned general surgery admissions declined considerably due to COVID19. These results provide a small yet relevant illustration of clinical and economic ramifications of this healthcare crisis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/economia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Br J Surg ; 108(5): 554-565, 2021 05 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery can be effective in weight reduction and diabetes remission in some patients, but is expensive. The costs of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were explored here. METHODS: Population-based retrospectively gathered data on patients with obesity and T2DM from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (2006-2017) were evaluated. Direct medical costs from baseline up to 60 months were calculated based on the frequency of healthcare service utilization and dispensing of diabetes medication. Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) scores and co-morbidity rates were measured to compare changes in co-morbidities between surgically treated and control groups over 5 years. One-to-five propensity score matching was applied. RESULTS: Overall, 401 eligible surgical patients were matched with 1894 non-surgical patients. Direct medical costs were much higher for surgical than non-surgical patients in the index year (€36 752 and €5788 respectively; P < 0·001) mainly owing to the bariatric procedure. The 5-year cumulative costs incurred by surgical patients were also higher (€54 135 versus €28 603; P < 0·001). Although patients who had bariatric surgery had more visits to outpatient and allied health professionals than those who did not across the 5-year period, surgical patients had shorter length of stay in hospitals than non-surgical patients in year 2-5. Surgical patients had significantly better CCI scores than controls after the baseline measurement (mean 3·82 versus 4·38 at 5 years; P = 0·016). Costs of glucose-lowering medications were similar between two groups, except that surgical patients had significantly lower costs of glucose-lowering medications in year 2 (€973 versus €1395; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery in obese patients with T2DM is expensive, but leads to an improved co-morbidity profile, and reduced length of hospitalization.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/cirurgia , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Eur J Cancer ; 151: 126-135, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979728

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although different treatment protocols for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) all achieve high cure rates, their health care utilisation and costs have not been rigorously compared. METHODS: Disease, treatment, and outcome data were chart abstracted for all children with ALL in Ontario, Canada, diagnosed 2002-2012. Linkage to population-based databases identified health care utilisation. Utilisation-associated costs were determined through validated algorithms. Chemotherapy-associated costs were calculated separately. Health care utilisation and costs were compared between patients receiving Children's Oncology Group (COG) versus Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)-based treatment. FINDINGS: Of 802 patients, 146 (18.2%) were treated on DFCI-based protocols. COG patients experienced significantly higher rates of emergency department (ED) visits (adjusted rate ratio [aRR]: 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.5; p = 0·01), whereas outpatient visit rates were 60% higher among DFCI patients (aRR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.5-1.7, p < 0.0001). In adjusted analyses, DFCI-associated cost intensity was 70% higher (aRR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5-1.9; p < 0.0001), mainly attributable to outpatient visit costs. Total chemotherapy costs were higher among COG-treated patients ($39,400 ± $1100 versus $33,400 ± $2800; p = 0.02). Among PEG-ASNase-treated patients, total chemotherapy costs were highest among DFCI patients (median $54,200 ± $7400; p = 0.003 versus COG patients). INTERPRETATION: COG and DFCI treatments were associated with higher ED visit rates and higher outpatient visit rates, respectively. Overall utilisation-associated costs were increased in DFCI-treated patients. Administration of some intravenous chemotherapy at home and decreases in PEG-ASNase cost would decrease health care utilisation and costs for all patients and mitigate differences between COG and DFCI protocols. FUNDING: C17 Research Network.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Custos Hospitalares , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/economia , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Ontário , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 90(6): 951-958, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016919

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in awake, clinically stable injured patients is controversial. It is associated with unnecessary radiation exposure and increased cost. We evaluate use of computed tomography (CT) imaging during the initial evaluation of injured patients at American College of Surgeons Levels I and II trauma centers (TCs) after blunt trauma. METHODS: We identified adult blunt trauma patients after motor vehicle crash (MVC) from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2007 and 2016 at Level I or II TCs. We defined awake clinically stable patients as those with systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or higher with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15. Computed tomography imaging had to have been performed within 2 hours of arrival. Whole-body computed tomography was defined as simultaneous CT of the head, chest and abdomen, and selective CT if only one to two aforementioned regions were imaged. Patients were stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: There were 217,870 records for analysis; 131,434 (60.3%) had selective CT, and 86,436 (39.7%) had WBCT. Overall, there was an increasing trend in WBCT utilization over the study period (p < 0.001). In patients with ISS less than 10, WBCT was utilized more commonly at Level II versus Level I TCs in patients discharged from the emergency department (26.9% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), which had no surgical procedure(s) (81.4% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.001) and no injury of the head (53.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.008) or abdomen (83.8% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.001). The risk-adjusted odds of WBCT was two times higher at Level II TC vs. Level I (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval 1.82-1.94; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whole-body computed tomography utilization is increasing relative to selective CT. This increasing utilization is highest at Level II TCs in patients with low ISSs, and in patients without associated head or abdominal injury. The findings have implications for quality improvement and cost reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, Level IV.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Redução de Custos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/tendências , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Surg Res ; 264: 408-417, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most commonly performed elective operation in the United States, with over 800,000 cases annually. While clinical outcomes comparing laparoscopic versus open techniques have been well documented, there is little data comparing costs associated with these techniques. This study evaluates the cost of healthcare resources during the 90-d postoperative period following inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Adult patients with an ICD-9 or CPT code for inguinal hernia repair from 2012 to 2014 were included. Patients with continuous enrollment for 6 mo prior to surgery and 6 mo after surgery were analyzed. Related healthcare service costs (readmission and/or ER visit and/or outpatient visit) were calculated by clinical classification software and generalized linear modeling was used to compare healthcare utilization between groups. RESULTS: 124,582 cases were identified (open = 84,535; lap = 40,047). Index surgery cost was 41% higher in laparoscopic cases. The cost for readmission was close to $25,000 and similar between both groups, but the laparoscopic group were 12% less likely to be readmitted for surgical complications within 90-d when compared to the open group. Cost of bilateral laparoscopic repair is less than that of serial unilateral open repairs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair carries a higher index surgery cost than open repair. However, open repair has an increased rate of readmission. To maximize value, efforts should be directed at minimizing readmissions and improving identification of bilateral hernias at the time of initial presentation.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Herniorrafia/economia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 91(2): 249-259, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33783416

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Uninsured trauma patients are at higher risk of mortality, limited access to postdischarge resources, and catastrophic health expenditure. Hospital Presumptive Eligibility (HPE), enacted with the 2014 Affordable Care Act, enables uninsured patients to be screened and acquired emergency Medicaid at the time of hospitalization. We sought to identify factors associated with successful acquisition of HPE insurance at the time of injury, hypothesizing that patients with higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (ISS >15) would be more likely to be approved for HPE. METHODS: We identified Medicaid and uninsured patients aged 18 to 64 years with a primary trauma diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) in a large level I trauma center between 2015 and 2019. We combined trauma registry data with review of electronic medical records, to determine our primary outcome, HPE acquisition. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 2,320 trauma patients, 1,374 (59%) were already enrolled in Medicaid at the time of hospitalization. Among those uninsured at arrival, 386 (40.8%) acquired HPE before discharge, and 560 (59.2%) remained uninsured. Hospital Presumptive Eligibility patients had higher ISS (ISS >15, 14.8% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001), longer median length of stay (2 days [interquartile range, 0-5 days] vs. 0 [0-1] days, p < 0.001), were more frequently admitted as inpatients (64.5% vs. 33.6%, p < 0.001), and discharged to postacute services (11.9% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001). Patient, hospital, and policy factors contributed to HPE nonapproval. In adjusted analyses, Hispanic ethnicity (vs. non-Hispanic Whites: aOR, 1.58; p = 0.02) and increasing ISS (p ≤ 0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of HPE approval. CONCLUSION: The time of hospitalization due to injury is an underused opportunity for intervention, whereby uninsured patients can acquire sustainable insurance coverage. Opportunities to increase HPE acquisition merit further study nationally across trauma centers. As administrative and trauma registries do not capture information to compare HPE and traditional Medicaid patients, prospective insurance data collection would help to identify targets for intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic, level IV.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Adulto Jovem
13.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 55(5): 434-440, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590811

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: With the aging U.S. population, peripheral vascular procedures will become increasingly common. The objective of this study is to characterize the factors associated with increased total costs after peripheral bypass surgery. METHODS: Data for 34,819 patients undergoing peripheral bypass surgery in NY State were extracted using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database for years 2009-2017. Patient demographics, All Patient Refined Diagnostic Related Groups (APR) severity score, mortality risk, hospital volume, and length of stay data were collected. Primary outcomes were total costs and length of stay. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 28.1% of peripheral bypass surgeries were performed in New York City. 7.9% of patients had extreme APR severity of illness whereas 32.0% had major APR severity of illness. 6.3% of patients had extreme risk of mortality and 1 in every 5 patients (20%) had major risk of mortality. 24.9% of patients were discharged to a facility. The mean length of stay (LOS) was 9.9 days. Patient LOS of 6-11 days was associated with +$2,791.76 total costs. Mean LOS of ≥ 12 days was associated with + $27,194.88 total costs. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors associated with an admission listed in the fourth quartile of total costs (≥$36,694.44) for peripheral bypass surgery included NYC location (2.82, CI 2.62-3.04), emergency surgery (1.12, CI 1.03-1.22), extreme APR 2.08, 1.78-2.43, extreme risk of mortality (2.73, 2.34-3.19), emergency room visit (1.68, 1.57-1.81), discharge to a facility (1.27, CI 1.15-1.41), and LOS in the third or fourth quartile (11.09, 9.87-12.46). CONCLUSION: The cost of peripheral bypass surgery in New York State is influenced by a variety of factors including LOS, patient comorbidity and disease severity, an ER admission, and discharge to a facility.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Alta do Paciente/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
14.
Surgery ; 169(5): 1188-1198, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33384161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Age- and intent-related differences in the burden and costs of firearm injury treated in emergency departments are not well-documented. METHODS: We performed a serial cross-sectional study of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Program Nationwide Emergency Department Survey from 2006 to 2016. We used International Classification of Diseases diagnoses codes revisions 9 and 10 to identify firearm injuries. We calculated survey-weighted counts, proportions, means, and rates and confidence intervals of national, age-specific (0-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-17, 18-44, 45-64, 65-84, >84) and intent-specific (assault, unintentional, suicide, undetermined) emergency department discharges for firearm injuries. We used survey-weighted regression to assess temporal trends. RESULTS: There was a total of 868,483 (25.5 per 100,000) emergency department visits for firearm injuries from 2006 to 2016, and 7.8% died in the emergency department. Overall, firearm injury rates remained steady (P = .78). The largest burden was among those 25 to 44 years of age, but their rates remained stable (10.8 per 100,000). Overall assault injuries declined from 39.7% to 36.4%, and overall unintentional injuries increased from 46.4% to 54.7%. Legal-intervention injuries declined from 0.6 to 0.3 per 100,000. The charges (total $4,059,070,364, $369,006,396/year) increased across time in age and intent groups. The mean predicted charges increased from $1,922 to $3,348 in those alive versus $3,741 to $6,515 among those who died. CONCLUSION: Interventions and programs to manage the consequences of firearm injury in persons who live with ongoing morbidity and economic burden are warranted.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/economia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/terapia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 55-59, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33453616

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Between October 2019 and February 2020, massive crowds protested in Lebanon against economic collapse. Various less than lethal weapons including riot control agents and rubber bullets were used by law enforcement, which led to several traumatic and chemical injuries among victims. This study describes the clinical presentation, management, outcome, and healthcare costs of injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of the hospital records of all the casualties presenting to the Emergency Department of the American University of Beirut Medical Center between October 17th, 2019, and February 29th, 2020, was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 313 casualties were evaluated in the ED, with a mean age of 30.2 +/- 9.6 years and a predominance of males (91.1%). Most were protestors (71.9%) and arrived through EMS (43.5%) at an influx rate of one patient presenting every 2.7-8 min. Most patients (91.1%) presented with an Emergency Severity Index of 3. Most patients (77.6%) required imaging with 10% having major findings including fractures and hemorrhages. Stones, rocks, and tear gas canisters (30.7%) were the most common mechanism of injury. Musculoskeletal injuries were most common (62.6%), followed by lacerations (44.7%). The majority (93.3%) were treated and discharged home and 3.2% required hospital admission, with 2.6% requiring surgery. CONCLUSION: Less-than-lethal weapons can cause severe injuries and permanent morbidity. The use of riot control agents needs to be better controlled, and users need to be well trained in order to avoid misuse and to lessen the morbidity, mortality, and financial burden.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Tumultos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Lacerações/terapia , Aplicação da Lei/métodos , Líbano , Masculino , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia
16.
World J Emerg Surg ; 16(1): 2, 2021 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hybrid emergency room (ER) systems, consisting of an angiography-computed tomography (CT) machine in a trauma resuscitation room, are reported to be effective for reducing death from exsanguination in trauma patients. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a hybrid ER system in severe trauma patients without severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing the hybrid ER system to the conventional ER system from the perspective of the third-party healthcare payer in Japan. A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model using a lifetime time horizon were constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and associated lifetime healthcare costs. Short-term mortality and healthcare costs were derived from medical records and claims data in a tertiary care hospital with a hybrid ER. Long-term mortality and utilities were extrapolated from the literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $47,619 per QALY gained and the discount rate was 2%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The hybrid ER system was associated with a gain of 1.03 QALYs and an increment of $33,591 lifetime costs compared to the conventional ER system, resulting in an ICER of $32,522 per QALY gained. The ICER was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold if the odds ratio of 28-day mortality was < 0.66. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the hybrid ER system was cost-effective with a 79.3% probability. CONCLUSION: The present study suggested that the hybrid ER system is a likely cost-effective strategy for treating severe trauma patients without severe TBI.


Assuntos
Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Japão , Cadeias de Markov , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
17.
Ann Surg ; 274(6): e522-e528, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904598

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the current and projected financial burden of EGS hospital admissions in a single-payer healthcare system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: EGS is an important acute care service, which demands significant healthcare resources. EGS admissions and associated costs have increased over time, associated with an aging demographic. The National Health Service is the sole provider of emergency care in Scotland. METHODS: Principal, high and low Scottish population projections were obtained for 2016 until 2041. EGS admission data were projected using an ordinary least squares linear regression model. An exponential function, fitted to historical length of hospital stay (LOS) data, was used to project future LOS. Historical hospital unit cost per bed day was projected using a linear regression model. EGS cost was calculated to 2041 by multiplying annual projections of population, admission rates, LOS, and cost per bed day. RESULTS: The adult (age >15) Scottish population is projected to increase from 4.5 million to 4.8 million between 2016 and 2041. During this time, EGS admissions are expected to increase from 83,132 to 101,090 per year, cost per bed day from £786 to £1534, and overall EGS cost from £187.3 million to £202.5 million. CONCLUSIONS: The future financial burden of EGS in Scotland is projected to increase moderately between 2016 and 2041. This is in sharp contrast to previous studies from settings such as the United States. However, if no further reductions in LOS or cost per bed day are made, especially for elderly patients, the cost of EGS will rise dramatically.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Sistema de Fonte Pagadora Única/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escócia , Adulto Jovem
18.
J Surg Res ; 260: 293-299, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Efficient Emergency Department (ED) throughput depends on several factors, including collaboration and consultation with surgical services. The acute care surgery service (ACS) collaborated with ED to implement a new process termed "FASTPASS" (FP), which might improve patient-care for those with acute appendicitis and gallbladder disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of FP. METHODS: FASTPASS is a joint collaboration between ACS and ED. ED physicians were provided with a simple check-list for diagnosing young males (<50-year old) with acute appendicitis (AA) and young males or females (<50-year old) with gallbladder disease (GBD). Once ED deemed patients fit our FP check-list, patients were directly admitted (FASTPASSed) to the observation unit. The ACS then came to evaluate the patients for possible surgical intervention. We performed outcome analysis before and after the institution of the FP. Outcomes of interest were ED length of stay (LOS), time from ED to the operating room (OR) (door-to-knife), hospital LOS (HLOS), and cost. RESULTS: During our 1-year study period, for those patients who underwent GBD/AA surgery, 56 (26%) GBD and 27 (26%) AA patients met FP criteria. Compared to the non-FP patients during FP period, FP halved ED LOS for GBD (7.4 ± 3.0 versus 3.5 ± 1.7 h, P < 0.001) and AA (6.7 ± 3.3 versus. 1.8 ± 1.6 h, P < 0.001). Similar outcome benefits were observed for door-to-knife time, HLOS, and costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the FP process improved ED throughput in a single, highly-trained ER leading to an overall improved patient care process. A future study involving multiple EDs and different disease processes may help decrease ED overcrowding and improve healthcare system efficiency.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Colecistectomia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicectomia/normas , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/economia , Lista de Checagem/métodos , Lista de Checagem/normas , Colecistectomia/economia , Colecistectomia/normas , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Comportamento Cooperativo , Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Eficiência Organizacional/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/economia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Triagem/economia , Triagem/métodos , Triagem/organização & administração , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Psychosoc Oncol ; 39(2): 204-218, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280542

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the averages of healthcare services utilization and of expenditures for men with prostate cancer with and without diagnoses of mood disorders applying propensity score matching (PSM), and to identify the potential predictors associated with increased healthcare expenditures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SAMPLE AND METHODS: A total of 308,602 weighted patients with prostate cancer were identified after applying PSM. The datasets for men with prostate cancer were extracted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 to 2015. For cohort formation, 1:1 PSM was applied. Healthcare utilization and expenditures analyzed included emergency room visits, length of stay for hospital inpatients, outpatient visits, office-based visits, and prescriptions. Generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link was used to determine which covariates are associated with the increase in healthcare expenditures for each healthcare service. FINDINGS: The mean expenditures for emergency room visits between men with prostate cancer and mood disorders was $3,092.34, and it was $1,330.64 for patients without mood disorders (p = 0.038). The weighted total expenditures for emergency room visits in prostate cancer patients with mood disorders is 57% higher (p = 0.0109). Moreover, the weighted total expenditures for outpatient visits in prostate cancer patients with mood disorders is 93% higher (p = 0.0001). The potential predictor in total healthcare expenditures is perceived health status (fair/poor) (p = 0.0066). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: Individuals with a diagnosis of mood disorders were found to have higher average healthcare expenditures in emergency room visits than those without mood disorders. Therefore, the implications of this study are to inform the patient care team that the assessment and management of mood disorders is a priority. Moreover, screening of mood- disorder symptoms should occur early to optimize care. Finally, policymakers should provide accessible care to minimize emergency room visits.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243373, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296413

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Taiwan has implemented the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) since 2010, and the quality of care under the DRG-Based Payment System is concerned. This study aimed to examine the characteristics, related factors, and time distribution of emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, and hospital transfers of inpatients under the DRG-Based Payment System for each Major Diagnostic Category (MDC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2012 to 2013 in Taiwan. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors related to ED visits, readmissions, and hospital transfers of patients under the DRG-Based Payment System. RESULTS: In this study, 103,779 inpatients were under the DRG-Based Payment System. Among these inpatients, 4.66% visited the ED within 14 days after their discharge. The factors associated with the increased risk of ED visits within 14 days included age, lower monthly salary, urbanization of residence area, comorbidity index, MDCs, and hospital ownership (p < 0.05). In terms of MDCs, Diseases and Disorders of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (MDC11) conferred the highest risk of ED visits within 14 days (OR = 4.95, 95% CI: 2.69-9.10). Of the inpatients, 6.97% were readmitted within 30 days. The factors associated with the increased risk of readmission included gender, age, lower monthly salary, comorbidity index, MDCs, and hospital ownership (p < 0.05). In terms of MDCs, the inpatients with Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium (MDC14) had the highest risk of readmission within 30 days (OR = 20.43, 95% CI: 13.32-31.34). Among the inpatients readmitted within 30 days, 75.05% of them were readmitted within 14 days. Only 0.16% of the inpatients were transferred to other hospitals. CONCLUSION: The study shows a significant correlation between Major Diagnostic Categories in surgery and ED visits, readmission, and hospital transfers. The results suggested that the main reasons for the high risk may need further investigation for MDCs in ED visits, readmissions, and hospital transfers.


Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Economia Hospitalar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Hospitais/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Urbanização , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA